Utilitarianism and Abortion

Abortion is one of the most debated turn outs across the globe. People from disparate sects of the ball club have their own perception on the spontaneous spontaneous spontaneous abortion. Some try to prove it morally defective and illegitimate while others goodify abortion on several grounds. There is no need to joint that people have their arguments in favor as well as in against the abortion and some(prenominal) the quite a littles seem to be right in specific circumstances. Apart from different opinions, law of a society has its own debates on the issue which can non be ignored.This paper intends to discuss the issue of abortion along with examining what functional scholars think on the abortion and several other related issues. useful view on abortion While examining the usefuls view about abortion one should mull over the honest aspect of the issue with perspective of greatest gladness. Utilitarian view believes that ethical value of whatever coiffe is determ ined by the maximum amount of happiness of biggest quality for hugest number of general population which it creates.John Stuart swot on abortion John Stuart powder is known as father of utilitarian view and it is not possible to understand the issue in Toto without seeing his view on the issue of abortion. John Stuart grind in his book utilitarianism, writes Utility, or the Greatest Happiness article of faith, holds that actions be right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intend pleasure, and the absence of infliction by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure.The idea given by John Stuart dweeb is popularly known as principle of greatest happiness. Right and wrong aspects of any action atomic number 18 decided on the basis of pleasure and pain in this principle of john Stuart lollygag. Happiness and pain are determined as per quality and amount in every incident though it is not that for easy to test the things unless someone has tested the amount of both pleasure and pain. John Stuart mill says that it is neat to be an unsatisfied human being rather than a satisfied pig and it is good to be unsatisfied Socrates than a satisfied fool.If a fool or a pig has different opinions, it is just because both of them know only their own aspects of the issue but others who are there for the comparison are acquainted with both the sides. In the light of in a higher place findings, it is difficult for the john Stuart mill to take any firm position on the issue of abortion because he, on no account experienced the truth and amount of happiness which comes from every one situation. Though it good to suggest that mill would have do his stand by analyzing it and comparing the same with the principle of greatest happiness.Application of utilitarian theory We analyze the issue of abortion in different situations and the first one is extreme pro life position which says th at abortion is unethical and should be considered illegal in all the situations. People who believe in this theory avow the opinion that fetus is a human being irrespective of its development. Greatest principle of happiness suggests that utilitarian theory does not endorse this view because as per this principle many people may be happy or unhappy by the decision of abortion but it is the mother whose opinion or pleasure matters.Another scenario suggests that abortion is immoral but when life of a mother is in danger, it should be allowed. This view suggests that a mothers life is more valuable because of her future ability to bear the child. Utilitarian theory does not endorse such theories because greatest principle of happiness suggests that abortion does not put forward most people very happy. In the third scenario, abortion is considered illegal because except in the special situation of rape. When a female is raped and becomes pregnant then she should be allowed to abortio n because sex was not pre planned.Utilitarian would probably grant their consent for abortion, considering the exceptional situation of such cases. People who consider abortion illegal forget about the rights of the women who are pregnant. They may consider it offending and unnecessary interfering in their in the flesh(predicate) life if they are prevented or advised to not receive abortion. Utilitarian theory also supports this view on the basis of greatest happiness principle. A complete different scenario on the abortion is that it is perfectly moral and legal because it is the discretion of thewoman to decide about her body and she should have the right of abortion if she considers it good for her.Utilitarian theory would probably have no any problem with this view because of the greatest happiness principle. bomber believes in individuals rights and advocates for such discretions upon own life. Conclusion After having observed the above mentioned detailed analysis of the sub ject, it is good to conclude that utilitarian theory advocates for the individual rights and further believes in the principle of greatest happiness. Utilitarian view criticizes abortion in very rare and exceptional cases where this is sheer wrong.Utilitarian point in time of view endorses abortion on the basis of personal life, individual rights and principle of greatest happiness. John Stuart mill opinion about abortion is based on the principle of humans greatest happiness. Mill suggests that an individual should always be at liberty to decide the things that give him greatest happiness. Abortion or any other issue should be decided by the individuals according to their own situation and interests, mill suggests. Mills opinion is widely appreciated and followed in North American countries in new(a) times as his views advocate for the human rights and liberty in a greater amount.